cxcl8 (Human Protein Atlas)
Structured Review

Cxcl8, supplied by Human Protein Atlas, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/cxcl8/pmc13198273-178-4-12?v=Human+Protein+Atlas
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
Images
1) Product Images from "Predicting glioma survival and extracellular matrix remodeling through MRI radiogenomics"
Article Title: Predicting glioma survival and extracellular matrix remodeling through MRI radiogenomics
Journal: Cell Reports Medicine
doi: 10.1016/j.xcrm.2026.102775
Figure Legend Snippet: Functional analysis of radiogenomics landscape (A) After feature selection, the 11-feature radiomics signature exhibited the best diagnostic performance. The areas under the receiver operator characteristic curve (AUCs) curve were 0.886 in the training set, 0.845 in the test set, 0.828 in the validation set, and 0.904 in the 5-fold cross-validated (CV) training set. (B) The weighted coefficients of selected radiomics features. (C) The volcano plot and hierarchical clustering of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between low- and high-Rad-score groups indicated that the landscape of genomics differed between low- and high-Rad-score groups. (D and E) The biological functional annotations for DEGs were performed by Gene Ontology (GO) function and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway enrichment analysis, as well as gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA). The top 10 radiogenomics-related biological processes were significantly correlated with the formation of ECM and activation of MMPs in GO-KEGG and GSEA. (F and G) Clustering and merging dendrogram of genes based on topological overlap performed by weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA) to identify the top 3 highest associated modules with Rad-score. Each row corresponds to a module eigengene with the corresponding correlation coefficient and p value from the left to the right side. (H and I) The most significant sub-network module and the top 10 genes with the highest maximum clique centrality score were identified by the “MCODE” and “CytoHubba” plug-in in Cytoscape. (J–M) (J and K) Hub genes had high connectivity. (L and M) Hub genes (MMP2, MMP9, CXCL8, TIMP1, IL-6, COL1A2, and CCL2) showed significantly up-regulated mRNA expression in the high-Rad-score group compared with the low-Rad-score group in both discovery and validation sets (∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗ p < 0.01, ∗∗∗ p < 0.001).
Techniques Used: Functional Assay, Selection, Diagnostic Assay, Biomarker Discovery, Activation Assay, Expressing
Figure Legend Snippet: The protein expression patterns of radiogenomics-based hub genes (A) The protein expression patterns of 7 hub genes between normal brain tissues and glioma were determined by immunohistochemistry (IHC) staining from The Human Protein Atlas (THPA) database. Compared with normal brain tissues, the protein expression levels of hub genes increased in glioma as the grading of the tumor increased, except for CXCL8 and IL-6 without obvious detection. (B) IHC staining of acquired glioma specimens in proliferative core exhibited higher protein expression levels of MMP2, MMP9, TIMP1, COL1A2, and CCL2 in the high-Rad-score group. Compared with the hub gene labeling index (LI) in the low-Rad-score group, LIs of MMP2, TIMP1, and COL1A2 were significantly higher in the high-Rad-score group (∗ p < 0.05; ∗∗ p < 0.01; ∗∗∗ p < 0.001). (C) The expression levels and localization of MMP2, TIMP1, and COL1A2 were shown by the multiplex immunohistochemistry (mIHC) staining. The biological markers represented by different colors are labeled in the figure. The expression of the three genes increased in the high-Rad-score group, and MMP2 exhibited the most significant difference.
Techniques Used: Expressing, Immunohistochemistry, Labeling, Multiplex Assay, Staining


![( a ) Cell viability was assessed with the MTT assay and data shown are means ± SD (n = 3). ( b ) <t>TNFα,</t> <t>IL-6</t> and IL-8 expression in response to B[a]P exposure. ( c ) Representative Western blot images showing protein expression. All data were obtained from three independent experiments. Statistical p values were determined by a one-way ANOVA, followed by a Tukey post-hoc test comparing the B[a]P treatments to the DMSO control; * p < 0.05; ¥, p < 0.01; NS, no significance.](https://bio-rxiv-images-cdn.bioz.com/dois_ending_with_31/10__64898_slash_2026__04__21__719931/10__64898_slash_2026__04__21__719931___F1.large.jpg)
